If you’ve come here looking for information on aneurysm surgery, chances are you are probably aware of the term ‘Aneurysm‘.
In case you haven’t, Aneurysm is a condition that involves bulging of a portion of a blood vessel in our body. For most people, aneurysm happens commonly in the aorta. The aorta is one of the largest blood vessels in the body.
The bulging of a blood vessel can be compared to that of a balloon. When too much air is blown into to a balloon, there is a significant chance of the balloon rupturing. Similarly when a blood vessel bulges too much, it may rupture or tear. Medically, this term is called dissection and is a life-threatening emergency.
An Aneurysm Surgery helps prevent this from happening. The surgery consists of removal of the dilated portion of the vessel and replacing it with a tube of synthetic material or graft that will no longer rupture.
There are a number of tests that need to be conducted before the aneurysm surgery can be performed. This is done to determine the health of your heart. A series of thorough physical exams will be conducted. Tests include…
Your doctor will give you a thorough explanation of the surgery and the positives it can have on your life and the negatives during the test period.
General anaesthesia is mandatory and it will be administered to you before the surgery to keep you unconscious throughout the entire procedure. In order to drain urine from your bladder, a long narrow tube called catheter will be inserted into your bladder. You will also have an intravenous drip (IV) administered through a vein in your neck to nourish your body with fluids before and after the surgical procedure.
An incision will be made depending on the location of the aneurysm in your body. Incisions are usually made through the side of the chest, breastbone or abdomen. The portion of blood vessel above and below the aneurysm will be clamped throughout the entire surgical procedure to prevent any bleeding.
After the incision is made, the weakened/dilated portion will be replaced with a tube of synthetic material called Dacron. The material is sewn with permanent stitches.
For those patients with a heart disease and a thoracic aorta aneurysm, a heart surgery may also be performed along with aneurysm surgery.
For the first couple of days after the completion of the procedure, the patient will be placed in the intensive care unit and closely monitored. Fluids and medications will be delivered to the patient via IV fluids. A breathing machine may also be required by some patients.
As the condition of the patient stabilizes, he/she will be placed in a normal ward for a period of 7-10 days in order to recover completely. The exact amount of time for a patient to fully recover from the surgery and go about his regular activities depends on the patient’s age, his health, etc and could take several days.
Nearly all surgeries have some potential complications, and surgery procedure for aortic aneurysm treat is not an exception. The same is the case with Aneurysm Surgery. That’s why it is mandatory to assess your heart’s health condition through a series of tests before surgery.
There are both minor as well as serious complications that could result from Aneurysm Surgery. Serious complications happen only in rare cases.
Some minor complications include:
- Infection of the graft, chest or the wound
- Leak of fluid from the wound
- Irregular bowel movements
- Impotence in male patients
Major complications:
- Kidney Failure
- Heart Attack
- Stroke
Disclaimer: The information presented above should not be construed as medical advice. It has been presented for information purposes only. Please consult a qualified health practitioner before considering whether you should proceed with Aneurysm Surgery or not.
]]>Radiological imaging is used in pre-operative planning of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and for intra-operative guidance and control. In pre-operative planning, imaging is used to get a measure of the 3D anatomy for investigating eligibility of EVAR and for choosing or customizing stentgrafts. A common imaging modality for this purpose is CT angiography. CT has the advantage of visualizing the entire anatomical area of interest. Transabdominal 3D ultrasound offers only a limited sector, and, in addition, parts of the relevant anatomy will be obscured by acoustical shadows or absorption.
Some of these challenges are avoided in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). IVUS has been used for pre-operative planning in combination with CT, for guidance and for control after device placement.
Several authors have concluded that IVUS gave accurate and reproducible measurements of the geometry of the aneurysm, and assisted in correct selection of stentgraft or final correction of stentgraft diameter or length. IVUS further assisted in rapid identification of fixation sites, and assessment of accuracy and patency of device placement.
Ultrasound guidance during minimally invasive therapy has been reported and is in regular use within some clinical applications. Especially within neurosurgery ultrasound has been found beneficial for intra-operative imaging. Intra-operative guidance during aneurysm endovascular treatment is usually performed with X-ray fluoroscopy. Both intraoperative CT as well as fluoroscopy in combination with navigation using electromagnetic sensors has been investigated for guiding insertion of fenestrated grafts. Some investigators have also reported transabdominal ultrasound for guidance of aneurysm endovascular treatment.
Lie et al. studied the use of 2D transabdominal ultrasound during endovascular treatment of aortic aneuysm. They found that ultrasound could be useful for guiding the insertion of guidewire and control the wire position before connecting second graft limb to the main limb of bifurcated grafts.
Kaspersen et al. reported a feasibility study registering ultrasound acquired during EVAR to pre-acquired CT data. This may be useful for updating the CT data used for navigation due to e.g. respiratory motion and deformation of the blood vessels during the procedure. With recent advances in ultrasound technology, we believe that real-time 3D ultrasound has potential for further advancing insertion of stentgraft, especially delivery of fenestrated stentgrafts. Specifically, it is easier to track e.g. the tip of guidewires in 3D, while simultaneously visualizing a focused area of the 3D anatomy in real-time, perhaps in combination with CT.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound has also been used intraoperatively for localization of fixation sites and identification of endoleaks. The fixation sites were visualized in >80% of the 17 patients investigated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and more endoleaks were detected than with conventional endovascular treatment of aneurysm. It was noted that ultrasound was especially beneficial in case of patients with contraindications for usage of X-ray contrast material. Percutaneous EVAR, i.e. minimally invasive femoral access, is an alternative to open femoral access. A systematic review by Malkawi et al. concluded that percutaneous EVAR was associated with fewer access related complications and reduced operating time. In a study by Arthurs et al., it was shown that use of ultrasound guided access significantly reduced access-related complications compared to percutanous access without ultrasound guidance.
]]>Aortic aneurysm is most often asymptomatic until rupture, and coincidentally detected during examination for other diseases. Ultrasound has been recommended for detection of AAA in symptomatic patients and for asymptomatic patients in risk groups. A number of studies suggest that population screening reduces AAA mortality in subgroups with increased AAA susceptibility. Screening may still represent an ethical dilemma because growth and rupture is difficult to predict, and it is therefore disputable when to recommend repair on a patient-specific basis, considering the risk involved in surgical or endovascular treatment.
High degree of validity of ultrasound for detection of aortic aneurysm has been reported. Numbers indicate a sensitivity and specificity of almost 100%. The accuracy and operator dependencies of size measurements are especially important in order to reliably monitor growth.
Emergency ultrasound is becoming more widespread as the development in ultrasound technology provides more portable and even handheld ultrasound scanners at an affordable cost. Ultrasound can be used bedside or in the ambulance for fast examination and early decision making. This development has a potential for reducing abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality by early detection of ruptured (or otherwise symptomatic) aneurysms, allowing early surgery without having to use time for additional examinations in the emergency entrance.
The sensitivity and specificity of detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm in emergency medicine ultrasound is almost 100%. With appropriate training, emergency residents accurately determine both presence as well as size of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Hoffmann et al. concluded that more experienced emergency department sonographers perform better in detecting aneurysms, and suggested training on more than 25 cases, including technically difficult cases, for credentialing personnel for the process. Although rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm could be indirectly diagnosed from clinical signs and symptoms and presence of an aneurysm, B-mode ultrasound can also reveal direct and indirect signs of rupture. Also, Catalano et al. further examined 8 ruptured AAA using contrast-enhanced ultrasound, concluding that contrast-enhanced ultrasound may be as effective as CT in detecting rupture, and does not delay surgery significantly.
]]>Endovascular aortic repair is a new catheter-based, imaging guided procedure that has the potential to redefine the traditional approach to the treatment of AAA.
Since it was first described by Parodi in 1991, its role in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture repair continues to be debated. In fact, while most published data drawn from non-randomised studies suggest that endovascular repair of ruptured aneurysm (EVRAR) is feasible in selected patients and in institutions specialized in endovascular techniques, the only published randomized control study by Hinchliffe et al. showed no benefit in terms of mortality or complications. But since that trial included symptomatic but non-ruptured AAA patients it is difficult to interpret these results.
Long-term findings are needed to assess if EVRAR effectively treats endoleaks, prevents late ruptures, and ensures stent-graft integrity. The potential advantages of EVRAR with respect to open repair, such as reduced blood loss, less need for transfusions, and shorter stays in the ICU seem to be due to a decreased physiological insult. As EVRAR obviates the need for laparotomy, direct surgical exposure, handling of abdominal contents, and aorto-iliac clamping, it is an attractive alternative and potentially helpful in reducing the mortality rate of ruptured aneurysm.
Different strategies are employed to treat ruptured aortic aneurysm using endovascular therapy. Proximal aortic control during EVRAR is obtained using a balloon placed in the visceral aorta via the brachial or the femoral accesses. The use of a balloon occlusion device is however associated to the risk of renal and splanchnic ischemia and distal embolization does not prevent on-going blood loss from ilio-femoral arteries.
The most common procedure is aorto-unifemoral graft. The advantage of this method is that the aneurysm is quickly excluded from the circulation since introduction and deployment is rapid, and the contralateral gate does not need to be engaged as opposed to the bifurcated endograft which can be time consuming in some situations. Stent grafts may offer wider applicability but can be used only when unilateral iliac anatomy is suitable, but a femoro-femoral crossover is nevertheless required.
Thanks to the recent diffusion of the endovascular technique most ruptured aortic aneurysms are treated using aorta-bi-iliac endografting, and no differences in outcomes have been found in the two types of endografts.
Abdominal compartment syndrome is a major cause of death after EVRAR and increases short-term mortality up to 5 times compared to that in patients with normal intra-abdominal pressure. All EVRAR patients should be monitored for this syndrome by frequent bladder pressure readings and open surgery must be considered when bladder pressure rises over 20 mm Hg.
Despite an increase in the volume of patients undergoing elective AAA repair over recent decades, the number of patients with ruptured aneurysm has not fallen significantly. Although the surgical mortality rate for elective AAA repair has steadily improved due to advancements in operative techniques and perioperative care and has fallen to less than 2% in specialized centres and 5% in less-specialized hospitals, the mortality rate of RAAA has not significantly changed over the past three decades and still ranges between 30 and 70% according to recent reports. The high mortality seems to be related to a combination of hemorrhagic shock and lower torso ischaemia followed by reperfusion injury despite successful revascularization.
]]>In contrast with atherosclerotic aortic aneurysms, the majority of patients with an intact inflammatory aneurysm are symptomatic.
The most common symptom for inflammatory aneurysmis abdominal and/or back pain while anorexia and weight loss are frequent associates. Ureteric entrapment causing colic is another unique feature. Interestingly the majority (85%) of these aneurysms is palpable at the time of diagnosis while one fourth is tender and have a bruit.
There are several reports of these patients having a moderate rise in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and this would further strengthen the accuracy of diagnosis of inflammatory aneurysms in symptomatic patients. Nevertheless the classic triad of chronic abdominal or back pain, elevated ESR, and weight loss is rare, implying a low diagnostic sensitivity but has high specificity for inflammatory aneurysms. When ureteric obstruction is added the diagnostic accuracy increases further.
Although preoperative clinical diagnosis of an inflammatory aneurysm was infrequent in the past, routine preoperative imaging since of late has significantly facilitated the diagnosis. The thickening of the aortic wall occurs in the anterior and lateral walls. This can be demonstrated by both CT scan and ultrasonography. The ultrasound scan shows an echolucent halo anteriorly and laterally with clear definition of the posterior aortic wall.
The diagnostic accuracy is greater with CT scanning. The characteristic findings are a preaortic retroperitoneal soft tissue density that is sometimes enhanced with intravenous contrast. It must be noted that these features could easily be mistaken for those from a leaking aneurysm with retroperitoneal hematoma.
Medial ureteral deviation or obstruction on CT ureterography in a patient with an aneurysm strongly suggests the inflammatory variety. Although lateral ureteral deviation may be seen with large atherosclerotic aneurysms, ureteral obstruction is very rare.
]]>Although the imaging findings of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture are usually obvious, small ruptures can be mistaken for unopacified bowel, lymph node enlargement, or perianeurysmal fibrosis. Careful examination of the morphology of the aneurysm may aid in detecting subtle ruptures.
In a retrospective study that evaluated CT scans of patients with ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms to determine whether a number of morphologic features were associated with rupture, the length of the aneurysm was not significantly different between the rupture and control groups. The ruptured aneurysms had significantly larger anteroposterior and transverse dimensions. The two groups had similar rates of lumen irregularity. Ruptured aneurysms contained a lesser amount of thrombus than aneurysms that were not ruptured. Thrombus calcification was seen more commonly in non-ruptured aneurysms, which was thought to be related to the greater amount of thrombus in the non-ruptured aneurysms.
Attenuation characteristics of the thrombus that were not associated with rupture included the homogeneous, diffusely heterogeneous, and low-attenuation periluminal halo patterns. High-attenuation crescents within the mural thrombus were seen only in ruptured aneurysms. Mural calcification patterns were also evaluated, and a focal discontinuity in otherwise circumferential calcification was rare and seen only in ruptured aneurysms. It was noted, however, that mural calcification was often discontinuous, and the discontinuity was most useful when shown to be new compared with a prior scan.
There are several studies that have examined hyperattenuating crescents as a sign of impending rupture. It has been reported that thrombus transformation with contrast extravasation into the thrombus and lumen irregularity signifies impending rupture. Mehard et al reported a significant correlation between impending rupture and high-attenuating crescents in the wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms on unenhanced CT scans. In this retrospective study, the high-attenuating crescents were present in 77% of patients with complicated aneurysms, with complications including intramural hematoma, contained rupture, and frank rupture.
The specificity of the “high-attenuating crescent” sign was 93%. For a crescent to be considered high attenuation, the crescent needed to be well defined and of higher attenuation than the psoas muscle on enhanced scans or of higher attenuation than that of the patent lumen on unenhanced scans. In another study, crescents of increased attenuation were present in 21% of ruptured aneurysms and in none of the patients with intact aneurysms.
Hyperattenuating crescents have been attributed histopathologically to hemorrhage into the mural thrombus or into the aneurysm wall, with clefts of blood seeping from the lumen into the thrombus. The hemorrhage later penetrates the aneurysm wall, which weakens the wall. This places the aneurysm at risk for frank rupture, and prompt surgical consultation should be obtained.
]]>Complications are symptomatic and life threatening. These include acute rupture into the retroperitoneal (85.3%) or peritoneal space (7.1%), or gastrointestinal tract (1.8%). Such ruptures typically cause exsanguinating hemorrhage and profound, unstable hypotension leading to death. In contrast some ruptures do not have an acute presentation, but are slow and contained, presenting with chronic low grade symptoms. Additionally rupture could also occur into major abdominal and pelvic veins (5.8%). Other complications include acute thrombotic occlusion of the aneurysm, distal thromboembolism and disseminated intravascular coagulation.
Rupture into the retroperitoneum typically originates from the left posterior aspect of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, whereas intra peritoneal rupture tends to occur from the right anterior aspect. Whenever the hemorrhage is tamponaded by the surrounding retroperitoneum and temporarily contained, hemodynamic compensatory mechanisms are able to maintain vital organ perfusion allowing the patient time to reach the hospital. Clinical suspicion of aneurysm rupture is therefore crucial for rational management and to prevent death.
Clinically, hypotension, pulsatile abdominal mass, and flank or back pain constitutes the classic triad for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. However, this triad may be incomplete in as many as 50% of patients contributing to misdiagnoses in 24-42%. The patient’s blood pressure often recovers and stabilizes giving normal vital signs at examination. An important clue to the diagnosis of rupture, a syncopal attack at the outset indicative of hypotension, may be easily overlooked. Abdominal obesity and muscle guarding contribute to impalpability of an aneurysm. Furthermore, when hypotensive, the aneurysm may become less pulsatile making it more difficult to detect. More than 80% of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm present without a previous diagnosis of an aneurysm. Even when it is known that there is an abdominal aneurysm, only 25% of vascular surgeons are able to palpate it at the time of preparation of the patient for surgery. Despite the incomplete triad, a correct and early diagnosis of rupture can still be made in the majority of cases, enabling prompt surgical or endovascular intervention. In the remainder, rupture of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta simulates other clinical conditions, where symptoms are related to impingement of the hematoma on adjacent structures. These include renal colic, acute cholecystitis, acute diverculitis of the sigmoid colon, and other gastrointestinal pathology that may delay the correct diagnosis and reduce the patient’s chance of survival.
Although aortic aneurysm ruptures usually present with acute symptoms requiring emergency treatment, in rare instances these get localized to the retroperitoneum and present with chronic compressive symptoms of hematoma which are more subtle and include months of back pain. Other symptoms have been described, including obturator neuropathy, obstructive jaundice and groin hernia. Chronic contained aneurysms represent only 4% of all ruptured aortic aneurysms and 2.7% of operated infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
The descriptive criteria of chronic contained rupture includes a known history of complicated aortic aneurysm, pain that radiates to the lower back, a stable condition and normal hematocrit value, radiologic findings of retroperitoneal hematoma, and pathologic confirmation of an organized hematoma. Retroperitoneal hematoma can lead to vertebral erosion in 30% of cases.
Symptoms are attributable to tissue compression or erosion and are most often found in the workup of back pain or an abdominal problem. The differential diagnosis includes primary and metastatic spinal tumors, retroperitoneal tumors, iliopsoas muscle abscess, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, and osteomalacia.
A thorough clinical and radiological workup is required, and the radiological examination should involve a careful look at all structures surrounding the vertebral body. CT scans or magnetic resonance imaging provide a rapid and noninvasive approach for the diagnosis and the extent of bony destruction.
]]>